You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatments of non-wood plant fibres used as reinforcement in composite materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Materials Research, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-14392013005000084 |
| Authors |
Marie-Ange Arsène, Ketty Bilba, Holmer Savastano, Khosrow Ghavami |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 40 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#250
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,938
of 209,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.