↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors in 291 patients with pulmonary metastases submitted to thoracotomy

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, June 1995
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic factors in 291 patients with pulmonary metastases submitted to thoracotomy
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, June 1995
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31801995000300005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedito Mauro Rossi, Ademar Lopes, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Rosana Cardoso de Oliveira Regazzini

Abstract

Pulmonary metastases are among the most common sites for the spread of cancer, particularly with mesenchymal tumors. Despite improvements in cancer therapy, the prognosis remains poor, except for the highly selective group of patients who are considered eligible for surgical treatment and those with chemosensitive tumors. The main objective of this study was to evaluate survival results of 291 patients who underwent thoracotomy due to pulmonary metastases between 1953 and 1986. The number of metastases ranged from a minimum of 1 to as many as 30. The type of resection depended on site, size, and number of pulmonary lesions: 154 wedge resections, 49 lobectomies, and 9 pneumectomies. The tumor was not resectable in the remaining 79 patients. Of the prognostic factors analyzed, only type of pulmonary resection (wedge vs. lobectomy vs. pneumectomy vs. unresectable) and disease free interval (DFI) between primary treatment and pulmonary metastases diagnosis (< or = 6 months vs. 7-12 months vs. > 12 months) were selected as independent predictors of the risk of death in multivariate analysis. A reduced model for bone tumors included disease free interval, sex and histology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%