You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of simple hysterectomy on bone loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, December 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-31801995000600003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosana Durães Simões, Edmund Chada Baracat, Vera Lúcia Szjenfeld, Geraldo Rodrigues de Lima, Wagner José Gonçalves, Claudia de Carvalho Ramos Bortoletto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#4
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,824
of 80,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them