↓ Skip to main content

Computerized psychiatric interviews: can they help to improve medical care?

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computerized psychiatric interviews: can they help to improve medical care?
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, September 1998
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31801998000500007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Tirol, Paulo Rossi Menezes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#4
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,170
of 31,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them