↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of electrical stimulation on rehabilitation after ligament and meniscal injuries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of electrical stimulation on rehabilitation after ligament and meniscal injuries: a systematic review
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31802011000600008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) is widely used to strengthen muscles following ligament and meniscal injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ES for rehabilitation after soft tissue injuries of the knee treated surgically or conservatively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 300 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 18%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 100 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Sports and Recreations 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 116 39%