You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gynecomastia: physiopathology, evaluation and treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-31802012000300009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alfredo Carlos Simões Dornellas de Barros, Marcelo de Castro Moura Sampaio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 2% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,709,583
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#10
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,247
of 252,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.