↓ Skip to main content

Molecular methods to evaluate effects of feed additives and nutrients in poultry gut microflora

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 427)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular methods to evaluate effects of feed additives and nutrients in poultry gut microflora
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1516-35982009001300022
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,432,872
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#45
of 427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,306
of 151,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 427 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.