↓ Skip to main content

Determination of the estrous cycle phases of rats: some helpful considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Biology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1068 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determination of the estrous cycle phases of rats: some helpful considerations
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Biology, November 2002
DOI 10.1590/s1519-69842002000400008
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. K. MARCONDES, F. J. BIANCHI, A. P. TANNO

Abstract

The short length of the estrous cycle of rats makes them ideal for investigation of changes occurring during the reproductive cycle. The estrous cycle lasts four days and is characterized as: proestrus, estrus, metestrus and diestrus, which may be determined according to the cell types observed in the vaginal smear. Since the collection of vaginal secretion and the use of stained material generally takes some time, the aim of the present work was to provide researchers with some helpful considerations about the determination of the rat estrous cycle phases in a fast and practical way. Vaginal secretion of thirty female rats was collected every morning during a month and unstained native material was observed using the microscope without the aid of the condenser lens. Using the 10 x objective lens, it was easier to analyze the proportion among the three cellular types, which are present in the vaginal smear. Using the 40 x objective lens, it is easier to recognize each one of these cellular types. The collection of vaginal lavage from the animals, the observation of the material, in the microscope, and the determination of the estrous cycle phase of all the thirty female rats took 15-20 minutes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,068 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 11 1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1036 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 176 16%
Student > Bachelor 170 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 15%
Researcher 88 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 70 7%
Other 174 16%
Unknown 235 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 229 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 136 13%
Neuroscience 116 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 88 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 74 7%
Other 153 14%
Unknown 272 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,575,753
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#3
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,792
of 53,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them