You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diet of Physalaemus cf. cicada (Leptodactylidae) and Bufo granulosus (Bufonidae) in a semideciduous forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Biology, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1519-69842007000100017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
AS. Santana, FA. Juncá |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#1
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,723
of 170,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them