You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toxicity of herbicides on Escherichia coli growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Biology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1519-69842012000100016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
RG Botelho, CM Froes, JB Santos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,369,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#3
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,838
of 255,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Biology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them