↓ Skip to main content

RAPELD: a modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
312 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RAPELD: a modification of the Gentry method for biodiversity surveys in long-term ecological research sites
Published in
Biota Neotropica, January 2005
DOI 10.1590/s1676-06032005000300002
Authors

William E. Magnusson, Albertina P. Lima, Regina Luizão, Flávio Luizão, Flávia R. C. Costa, Carolina Volkmer de Castilho, V. F. Kinupp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 79 11%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 606 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 146 21%
Researcher 108 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 9%
Student > Bachelor 64 9%
Student > Postgraduate 63 9%
Other 164 24%
Unknown 87 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 433 62%
Environmental Science 123 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 1%
Engineering 5 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 101 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,945,760
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,369
of 153,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.