You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Habitat use by two species of Hypostomus (Pisces, Loricariidae) in southeastern brazilian streams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biota Neotropica, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1676-06032005000300012 |
| Authors |
Lilian Casatti, Fabíola C. Rocha, Danusa C. Pereira |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 14 | 8% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,508,716
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,690
of 153,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them