↓ Skip to main content

Intrarectal ice application prior to transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial accessing pain and collateral effects

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intrarectal ice application prior to transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomised trial accessing pain and collateral effects
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.01.14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baris Caliskan, Nazim Mutlu

Abstract

To analyze the efficacy of intrarectal ice application as an anesthetic method prior to transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. A total of 120 consecutive men were included into the study prospectively. Patients were equally randomized as group 1 and 2 with 60 patients each. Ice was applied as an anesthetic method 5 minutes before procedure to the patients in group 1. Patients in group 2 were applied 10 mL of 2% lidocaine gel 10 minutes before procedure. Twelve core biopsy procedure was performed for all patients. The pain level was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Median pain score was 3.5 (1-8) in group 1 and 5 (1-8) in group 2. There is significantly difference between groups regarding the mean sense of pain level during the procedure. (p=0.007) There was also no difference in complications between two groups about presence and duration of macroscopic hematuria and rectal bleeding. Intrarectal ice application prior to TRUS prostate biopsy has an effect on reducing pain. Development of new techniques about cold effect or ice can make this method more useful and decrease complication rates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 47%