↓ Skip to main content

4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
4-Ports endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: preliminary and learning curve results
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.0323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Humberto do Nascimento Barbosa, Tiberio Moreno Siqueira, Françualdo Barreto, Leonardo Gomes Menezes, Mauro José Catunda Luna, Adriano Almeida Calado

Abstract

There is a lack of studies in our national scenario regarding the results obtained by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique (LRP). Except for a few series, there are no consistent data on oncological, functional, and perioperative results on LRP held in Brazil. As for the LRP technique performed by extraperitoneal access (ELRP), when performed by a single surgeon, the results are even scarcer. To analyze the early perioperative and oncologic results obtained with the ELRP, throughout the technical evolution of a single surgeon. A non-randomized retrospective study was held in a Brazilian hospital of reference. In the 5-year period, 115 patients underwent the ELRP procedure. Patients were divided into two groups, the first 57 cases (Group 1) and the following 58 cases, (Group 2). A comparative analysis between the groups of efficacy results and ELRP safety was carried out. The average age of patients was 62.8 year-old and the PSA of 6.9ng/dl. The total surgery time was 135.8 minutes on average, and the urethral-bladder anastomosis was 21.9 min (23.3 min versus 20.7 min). The positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 17.1%, showing no difference between groups (16.4% versus 17.9%; p=0.835). There was statistical difference between the groups in relation to the anastomosis time, estimated blood loss and the withdrawal time of the urinary catheter. The ELRP technique proved to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of prostate cancer, with low morbidity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Linguistics 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%