↓ Skip to main content

Robotic excision of vaginal pouch in ovotesticular disorder of sexual development

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic excision of vaginal pouch in ovotesticular disorder of sexual development
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, December 2022
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prashant Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Sridhar Panaiyadiyan, Prem Nath Dogra

Abstract

Ovotesticular disorder of sexual development (DSD) is the rarest of DSDs with an incidence of 1:20000 (1). Management of vaginal pouches in such cases is warranted for symptomatic presentations and laparoscopy is considered the gold standard treatment (2). We report a rare case of robotic excision of a large symptomatic vaginal pouch in a 19-year-old boy with ovotesticular DSD. A 19-year-old boy with ovotesticular DSD post hypospadias repair in early childhood presented with complaints of recurrent UTIs, ballooning of urethra during micturition and post-void dribbling. Ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were suggestive of a vaginal pouch. The patient underwent endo-evaluation followed by robot-assisted excision of the vaginal pouch. Endo-evaluation showed two orifices in the posterior urethra. The posterior orifice was leading into a blind-ending rudimentary uterus and the true urethra was lying anteriorly. The DaVinci Xi Robotic Surgical System was used and the entire pouch was dissected free of the surrounding tissues using monopolar scissors. The pouch was transected just a few millimetres from its junction with the urethra. The urethra was then closed with V-loc 4-0 suture. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 2 and the catheter was removed on day 21. Follow-up VCUG at 6 weeks did not show any residual pouch. There was no complaint of post-void dribbling or UTI at 30 months of follow-up. Robot-assisted laparoscopy should be considered as an alternative to laparoscopy for the primary treatment of a large symptomatic vaginal pouch.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Unknown 7 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#356
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,805
of 487,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.