↓ Skip to main content

Bladder substitution by ileal neobladder for women with interstitial cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bladder substitution by ileal neobladder for women with interstitial cystitis
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, October 2007
DOI 10.1590/s1677-55382007000400005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wachira Kochakarn, Panuwat Lertsithichai, Wipaporn Pummangura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Other 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 64%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#171
of 726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,749
of 89,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Brazilian Journal of Urology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 726 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them