↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of occlusal splints fabricated in centric relation or maximum intercuspation in temporomandibular disorders patients
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, February 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572009000100007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 19%
Student > Postgraduate 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 52 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 51%
Psychology 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 61 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2018.
All research outputs
#9,401,767
of 27,412,402 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#106
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,363
of 199,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,412,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them