↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, September 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bahadir EZMEK, Ahmet ARSLAN, Cagri DELILBASI, Kemal SENCIFT

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 44%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 2%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 54 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 59%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 53 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,282
of 103,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.