You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cell block technique as a complementary method in the clinical diagnosis of cyst-like lesions of the jaw
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572011000300016 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Riet Correa RIVERO, Liliane Janete GRANDO, Fabíola MENEGAT, Jonathas Daniel Paggi CLAUS, Felipe Marcelo XAVIER |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,392
of 122,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.