↓ Skip to main content

A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, May 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Herrmann COELHO-DE-SOUZA, Junara Cristina CAMARGO, Tiago BESKOW, Matheus Dalmolin BALESTRIN, Celso Afonso KLEIN-JÚNIOR, Flávio Fernando DEMARCO

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 52%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 32 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#101
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,372
of 179,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.