↓ Skip to main content

Molecular techniques for the study and diagnosis of parasite infection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular techniques for the study and diagnosis of parasite infection
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1678-91992011000300003
Authors

RG Tavares, R Staggemeier, ALP Borges, MT Rodrigues, LA Castelan, J Vasconcelos, ME Anschau, SM Spalding

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,796,929
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#182
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,992
of 193,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.