↓ Skip to main content

Carbon dioxide as a substitute for iodine contrast in arteriography during embolectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon dioxide as a substitute for iodine contrast in arteriography during embolectomy
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), June 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1679-45082015rc2997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nelson Wolosker, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Cynthia de Almeida Mendes, Kenji Nishinari, Mariângela de Freitas Ribeiro, Sergio Kuzniec

Abstract

Acute limb ischemia can be potentially harmful to the limb and life threatening. Renal failure is a possible outcome associated with release of products of ischemic limb reperfusion. Some authors reported the benefit of performing angiography after embolectomy, even though iodine contrast is also nephrotoxic. We report a case of embolectomy on a patient with renal insufficiency in whom carbon dioxide was used as a substitute for iodine contrast.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 38%
Unspecified 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 69%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#421
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,511
of 280,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.