↓ Skip to main content

Epipericardial fat necrosis: an unusual cause of chest pain

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epipericardial fat necrosis: an unusual cause of chest pain
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132013000500014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karina de Souza Giassi, André Nathan Costa, André Apanavicius, Guilherme Hipólito Bachion, Rafael Silva Musolino, Ronaldo Adib Kairalla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#325
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,018
of 289,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#30
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.