↓ Skip to main content

Intrapulmonary lymph node: a common and underrecognized tomography finding

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intrapulmonary lymph node: a common and underrecognized tomography finding
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132013000600017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Hochhegger, Daniela Quinto dos Reis Hochhegger, Klaus Irion, Ana Paula Sartori, Fernando Ferreira Gazzoni, Edson Marchiori

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#22,830,981
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#556
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,817
of 289,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#50
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.