↓ Skip to main content

Inhalation therapy in mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 724)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhalation therapy in mechanical ventilation
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132015000000035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juçara Gasparetto Maccari, Cassiano Teixeira, Marcelo Basso Gazzana, Augusto Savi, Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer-Neto, Marli Maria Knorst

Abstract

Patients with obstructive lung disease often require ventilatory support via invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, depending on the severity of the exacerbation. The use of inhaled bronchodilators can significantly reduce airway resistance, contributing to the improvement of respiratory mechanics and patient-ventilator synchrony. Although various studies have been published on this topic, little is known about the effectiveness of the bronchodilators routinely prescribed for patients on mechanical ventilation or about the deposition of those drugs throughout the lungs. The inhaled bronchodilators most commonly used in ICUs are beta adrenergic agonists and anticholinergics. Various factors might influence the effect of bronchodilators, including ventilation mode, position of the spacer in the circuit, tube size, formulation, drug dose, severity of the disease, and patient-ventilator synchrony. Knowledge of the pharmacological properties of bronchodilators and the appropriate techniques for their administration is fundamental to optimizing the treatment of these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,450,705
of 25,972,223 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#31
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,008
of 362,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,972,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.