↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the postural stability in individuals with or without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of the postural stability in individuals with or without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1806-83242008000400016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability and the distribution of weight of individuals with TMD (Temporomandibular Disorder) when placed in an orthostatic position. Forty female volunteers, participating in this study, were distributed into a control and a TMD group. Clinical examinations of the craniomandibular system and of the neck were performed. Postural stability was evaluated using a stabilographic platform. Through this system, the sway index (SI), the maximum medial-lateral distance (MMLD), the maximum anterior-posterior distance (MAPD) and the medial-lateral symmetry (MLS) could be determined. Tests were performed in the mandibular rest position and during isometric and isotonic contraction. The variables were analyzed through repeated measures ANOVA. The level of significance was p < 0.05. The results of this study indicate that individuals with TMD present more pain in the cervical region (p < 0.05). The group with TMD showed a significant reduction in SI (p < 0.05), MMLD (p < 0.05) and MLS (p < 0.01). Individuals with TMD presented greater postural asymmetry, and cervical pain demonstrated a potential link with an increase in postural stability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 46 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2019.
All research outputs
#23,417,455
of 29,474,265 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#271
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,445
of 121,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,474,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.