You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of simulated incipient furcation involvement by CBCT: an in vitro study using pig mandibles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Oral Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1806-83242012000400010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Otavio Shoiti Umetsubo, Bruno Felipe Gaia, Felipe Ferreira Costa, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 61% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#65
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,215
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them