↓ Skip to main content

Influence of delayed pouring on irreversible hydrocolloid properties

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of delayed pouring on irreversible hydrocolloid properties
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1806-83242012000500005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéfani Becker Rodrigues, Carolina Rocha Augusto, Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune, Susana Maria Werner Samuel, Fabrício Mezzomo Collares

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid materials poured immediately and after different storage periods. Four alginates were tested: Color Change (Cavex); Hydrogum (Zhermack); Hydrogum 5 (Zhermack); and Hydro Print Premium (Coltene). Their physical properties, including the recovery from deformation (n = 3), compressive strength (n = 3), and detail reproduction and gypsum compatibility (n = 3), were analyzed according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 18. Specimens were stored at 23ºC and humidity and were then poured with gypsum immediately and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. The data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test at p < 0.05. All of the alginate impression materials tested exhibited detail reproduction and gypsum compatibility at all times. Hydro Print Premium and Hydrogum 5 showed recovery from deformation, as established by ANSI/ADA specification no. 18, after 5 days of storage. As the storage time increased, the compressive strength values also increased. Considering the properties of compounds' recovery from deformation, compressive strength, and detail reproduction and gypsum compatibility, irreversible hydrocolloids should be poured immediately.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 6%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Oral Research
#384
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,283
of 190,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Oral Research
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.