You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of Pain on Palpation of the Inferior Pole of the Patella Among Patients with Complaints of knee Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322009000300009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonardo Addêo Ramos, Rogério Teixeira de Carvalho, Emerson Garms, Marcelo Schmith Navarro, Rene Jorge Abdalla, Moisés Cohen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2011.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#543
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,364
of 108,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.