You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Predictor variables for half marathon race time in recreational female runners
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Beat Knechtle, Patrizia Knechtle, Ursula Barandun, Thomas Rosemann, Romuald Lepers |
Abstract |
The relationship between skin-fold thickness and running performance has been investigated from 100 m to the marathon distance, except the half marathon distance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 40 | 45% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,317
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.