↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular responses to passive static flexibility exercises are influenced by the stretched muscle mass and the Valsalva maneuver

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular responses to passive static flexibility exercises are influenced by the stretched muscle mass and the Valsalva maneuver
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000300017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo T V Farinatti, Pedro P S Soares, Walace D Monteiro, Antonio F A Duarte, Luis A Viveiros de Castro

Abstract

The respiratory pattern is often modified or even blocked during flexibility exercises, but little is known about the cardiovascular response to concomitant stretching and the Valsalva maneuver (VM) in healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 23%
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2011.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#824
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,502
of 190,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#57
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.