You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why are there defaulters in eye health projects?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322011000900014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Regina Noma, Regina de S. Carvalho, Newton Kara-José |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#326
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,801
of 190,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#20
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.