You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Otomycosis: a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1808-86942009000300010 |
| Authors |
Zélia Braz Vieira da Silva Pontes, Anna Débora Ferreira Silva, Edeltrudes de Oliveira Lima, Márcio de Holanda Guerra, Neuza Maria Cavalcanti Oliveira, Maria de Fátima Farias Peixoto Carvalho, Felipe Sarmento Queiroga Guerra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,796,929
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#147
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,949
of 127,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.