You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implantable Prosthesis of Osseous Conduction (BAHA): Case Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1809-48722011000200020 |
| Authors |
Maurico Buschle, Rita de Cássia Mendes, André Luiz Ataíde, Rodrigo Pereira, Trissia Maria Farah Vassoler, José Fernando Polanski, Angela Ribas, Claudia Mittelmann Stumpf, Raquel Alves Nobre, Roberta Daroit, Izabella Vince Garcia Pedriali |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#91
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,408
of 329,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.