You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An evaluation on the effectiveness of rhythmic stimulation sound directed to elderly
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1809-98232011000100007 |
Authors |
Heron Beresford, Mira Célia Benvenuto, Renata de Sousa Mota, Iris Lima e Silva, Fabrício Bruno Cardoso |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 100% |
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#117
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,481
of 193,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.