You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
O modelo bioético principialista aplicado no manejo da dor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1983-14472013000100024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Layz Alves Ferreira Souza, Ana Paula da Costa Pessoa, Maria Alves Barbosa, Lilian Varanda Pereira |
| Abstract |
An integrative literature review was developed with the purpose to analyze the scientific production regarding the relationships between pain and the principles of bioethics (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice). Controlled descriptors were used in three international data sources (LILACS, SciELO, MEDLINE), in April of 2012, totaling 14 publications categorized by pain and autonomy, pain and beneficence, pain and nonmaleficence, pain and justice. The adequate relief of pain is a human right and a moral issue directly related with the bioethical principlism standard model (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice). However, many professionals overlook the pain of their patients, ignoring their ethical role when facing suffering. It was concluded that principlism has been neglected in the care of patients in pain, showing the need for new practices to change this setting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 41% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#144
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,359
of 212,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.