↓ Skip to main content

The influence of xenobiotics in river sediment on the reproduction and survival of Daphnia magna, 1820, Straus

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The influence of xenobiotics in river sediment on the reproduction and survival of Daphnia magna, 1820, Straus
Published in
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, October 2012
DOI 10.1590/s2179-975x2012005000040
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2012.
All research outputs
#24,992,549
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#79
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,762
of 209,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.