You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) farming system: water quality and environmental changes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s2179-975x2014000100003 |
| Authors |
Cacilda Thais Janson Mercante, André Martins Vaz-dos-Santos, Munique de Almeida Bispo Moraes, Jeniffer Sati Pereira, Júlio Vicente Lombardi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#73
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,121
of 240,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.