↓ Skip to main content

Talassemia beta maior e gestação na adolescência: relato de dois casos

Overview of attention for article published in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Talassemia beta maior e gestação na adolescência: relato de dois casos
Published in
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/so100-720320150005169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Augusto Monteiro Castro Trigo, Fernanda Garanhani Surita, Mary Angela Parpinelli, Belmiro Gonçalves Pereira, Kleber Yotsumoto Fertrin, Maria Laura Costa

Abstract

Beta thalassemia major is a rare hereditary blood disease in which impaired synthesis of beta globin chains causes severe anemia. Medical treatment consists of chronic blood transfusions and iron chelation. We describe two cases of adolescents with beta thalassemia major with unplanned pregnancies and late onset of prenatal care. One had worsening of anemia with increased transfusional requirement, fetal growth restriction, and placental senescence. The other was also diagnosed with hypothyroidism and low maternal weight, and was admitted twice during pregnancy due to dengue shock syndrome and influenza H1N1-associated respiratory infection. She also developed fetal growth restriction and underwent vaginal delivery at term complicated by uterine hypotonia. Both patients required blood transfusions after birth and chose medroxyprogesterone as a contraceptive method afterwards. This report highlights the importance of medical advice on contraceptive methods for these women and the role of a specialized prenatal follow-up in association with a hematologist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Psychology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,486
of 282,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.