↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an illustrated home exercise guide on promoting urinary continence during pregnancy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of an illustrated home exercise guide on promoting urinary continence during pregnancy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial
Published in
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/so100-720320150005361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liamara Cavalcante de Assis, João Marcos Bernardes, Angélica Mércia Pascon Barbosa, Ana Carolina Monteiro Santini, Luana Schneider Vianna, Adriano Dias

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of an illustrated home exercise guide targeting the pelvic floor muscles in promoting urinary continence during pregnancy. A randomized clinical trial was performed with 87 participants, evaluated six times during pregnancy and divided into three groups: Gsup, supervised; Gobs, not supervised, and Gref, women who did not perform the home exercises program. A miction diary and perineometry were used to evaluate urinary incontinence (primary outcome) and pelvic floor muscle strength (secondary outcome), respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn's and chi-square and Z tests with Bonferroni correction were used for continuous variables and proportions, respectively, with the level of significance set at 5%. At the end of the study, 6.9% of pregnant women in the Gsup and Gobs had urinary incontinence, while 96.6% of Gref women were incontinent. Regarding pelvic floor muscle function, Gsup and Gobs had mean contractions of 10 and 8.9 cmH2O, respectively, while Gref had a value of 4.7 cmH2O. Both results were significant. An illustrated home exercise guide targeting the pelvic floor muscles is effective in promoting urinary continence during pregnancy, even without permanent supervision.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 23%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 34 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,509,016
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#1
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,507
of 288,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them