↓ Skip to main content

Diffuse neurofibroma - an uncommon cause of alopecia

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffuse neurofibroma - an uncommon cause of alopecia
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasco Coelho Macias, Margarida Rafael, Cândida Fernandes, Joaninha Costa Rosa

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#2
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,496
of 323,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.