↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an algorithm based on the literature*

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma: an algorithm based on the literature*
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flávio Barbosa Luz, Camila Ferron, Gilberto Perez Cardoso

Abstract

Although basal cell carcinoma can be effectively managed through surgical excision, the most suitable surgical margins have not yet been fully determined. Furthermore, micrographic surgery is not readily available in many places around the world. A review of the literature regarding the surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma was conducted in order to develop an algorithm for the surgical treatment of basal cell carcinoma that could help the choice of surgical technique and safety margins, considering the major factors that affect cure rates. Through this review, it was found that surgical margins of 4mm seem to be suitable for small, primary, well-defined basal cell carcinomas, although some good results can be achieved with smaller margins and the use of margin control surgical techniques. For treatment of high-risk and recurrent tumors, margins of 5-6 mm or margin control of the surgical excision is required. Previous treatment, histological subtype, site and size of the lesion should be considered in surgical planning because these factors have been proven to affect cure rates. Thus, considering these factors, the algorithm can be a useful tool, especially for places where micrographic surgery is not widely available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 54%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 24 35%