↓ Skip to main content

Radiofrequency for the treatment of skin laxity: mith or truth*

Overview of attention for article published in Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Radiofrequency for the treatment of skin laxity: mith or truth*
Published in
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153605
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

AbstractThe nonablative radiofrequency is a procedure commonly used for the treatment of skin laxity from an increase in tissue temperature. The goal is to induce thermal damage to thus stimulate neocollagenesis in deep layers of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. However, many of these devices haven't been tested and their parameters are still not accepted by the scientific community. Because of this, it is necessary to review the literature regarding the physiological effects and parameters for application of radiofrequency and methodological quality and level of evidence of studies. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PEDro, SciELO, PubMed, LILACS and CAPES and experimental studies in humans, which used radiofrequency devices as treatment for facial or body laxity, were selected. The results showed that the main physiological effect is to stimulate collagen synthesis. There was no homogeneity between studies in relation to most of the parameters used and the methodological quality of studies and level of evidence for using radiofrequency are low. This fact complicates the determination of effective parameters for clinical use of this device in the treatment of skin laxity. The analyzed studies suggest that radiofrequency is effective, however the physiological mechanisms and the required parameters are not clear in the literature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 10 10%
Researcher 6 6%
Professor 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 42 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 45 47%