You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultraviolet radiation emitted by lamps, TVs, tablets and computers: are there risks for the population?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida Alzira Gomes Duarte, Mariana de Figueiredo Silva Hafner, Andrey Augusto Malvestiti |
| Abstract |
The frequent human exposure to various types of indoor lamps, as well as other light sources (television monitors, tablets and computers), raises a question: are there risks for the population? In the present study the emission of UVA and UVB radiation by lamps and screens of electronic devices were measured in order to determine the safe distance between the emitting source and the individual. We concluded that the lamps and electronic devices do not emit ultraviolet radiation; so they pose no health risk for the population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 926 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 356 | 38% |
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| Morocco | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Maldives | 2 | <1% |
| Thailand | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 3% |
| Unknown | 505 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 908 | 98% |
| Scientists | 4 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 8 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 695. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#30,970
of 25,997,855 outputs
Outputs from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#1
of 1,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236
of 277,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,997,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.