↓ Skip to main content

Physical therapists' role in prevention and management of patellar tendinopathy injuries in youth, collegiate, and middle-aged indoor volleyball athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical therapists' role in prevention and management of patellar tendinopathy injuries in youth, collegiate, and middle-aged indoor volleyball athletes
Published in
Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia., October 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kornelia Kulig, Lisa M. Noceti-DeWit, Stephen F. Reischl, Rob F. Landel

Abstract

Patellar tendinopathy is highly prevalent in all ages and skill levels of volleyball athletes. To illustrate this, we discuss the clinical, biomechanical, and ultrasound imaging presentation and the intervention strategies of three volleyball athletes at different stages of their athletic career: youth, middle-aged, and collegiate. We present our examination strategies and interpret the data collected, including visual movement analysis and dynamics, relating these findings to the probable causes of their pain and dysfunction. Using the framework of the EdUReP concept, incorporating Education, Unloading, Reloading, and Prevention, we propose intervention strategies that target each athlete's specific issues in terms of education, rehabilitation, training, and return to sport. This framework can be generalized to manage patellar tendinopathy in other sports requiring jumping, from youth to middle age, and from recreational to elite competitive levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 23%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,322,791
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#279
of 897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,047
of 287,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisioterapia : organo de la Asociacion Espanola de Fisioterapia.
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them