↓ Skip to main content

Challenging dilemmas of low grade, non-invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in International Brazilian Journal of Urology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenging dilemmas of low grade, non-invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review
Published in
International Brazilian Journal of Urology, June 2022
DOI 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Korkes, Phillipe E. Spiess, Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo, Andrea Necchi

Abstract

To describe the current scientific knowledge and clinical experience in low-grade-non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-NMIBC) patients in challenging scenarios. Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central were searched until March 2021. A total of 841 studies were identified, and abstracts were analyzed. Twenty-one relevant studies were then identified and reviewed. After all, information was gathered from 16 studies, the authors discussed the specific topics, and expert opinions were also included in the discussion. There have been some studies that can help us to have some insights on how to manage these patients. Very distinctive strategies have been reported in the literature, mainly anecdotally or in small randomized studies. Some of these treatments outlined in the present manuscript include repeated TURBTs, chemoablation, BCG immunoablation, partial cystectomy, radical cystectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and future perspectives. In the current manuscript, we have combined these strategies in a proposed algorithm. For those LG-NMIBC patients in challenging scenarios, we have found repeated TURBTs, chemoablation, BCG immunoablation, partial cystectomy, radical cystectomy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are attractive modalities to treat them effectively. Also, the current manuscript proposes an algorithm to overcome these challenges.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%