You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Saprochaete clavata invasive infection: characterization, antifungal susceptibility, and biofilm evaluation of a rare yeast isolated in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1678-9946202365012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Letícia Kraft, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Luiz Pedro Petroski, Roberto Hirochi Herai, Kamila Chagas Peronni, David Livingstone Alves Figueiredo, Fábio Araujo Motta, Felipe Francisco Tuon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,954,044
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#568
of 788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,202
of 479,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 788 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.