↓ Skip to main content

Variation in lung function is associated with worse clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in lung function is associated with worse clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2015
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37562015000000006
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Paulo Heinzmann-Filho, Leonardo Araujo Pinto, Paulo José Cauduro Marostica, Márcio Vinícius Fagundes Donadio

Abstract

To determine whether the variation in lung function over one year is associated with worse clinical outcomes, as well as with a decline in lung function in the following years, in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This was a retrospective study involving CF patients (4-19 years of age), evaluated over a three-year period. We evaluated demographic characteristics, chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, antibiotic use, hospitalization, six-minute walk distance (6MWD), and lung function. The inclusion criterion was having undergone pulmonary function testing at least three times in the first year and at least once in each of the next two years. We evaluated 35 CF patients. The variation in FEV1 in the first year (FEV1) was greater among those who, in the third year, showed reduced FEV1, had a below-average 6MWD, or were hospitalized than among those with normal FEV1, normal 6MWD, or no hospital admissions, in that same year (p < 0.05), although no such difference was found for antibiotic use in the third year. Subjects showing a FEV1 ≥ 10% also showed a greater decline in FEV1 over the two subsequent years (p = 0.04). The FEV1 also showed an inverse correlation with absolute FEV1 in the third year (r = -0.340, p = 0.04) and with the rate of FEV1 decline (r = -0.52, p = 0.001). Linear regression identified FEV1 as a predictor of FEV1 decline (coefficient of determination, 0.27). Significant variation in lung function over one year seems to be associated with a higher subsequent rate of FEV1 decline and worse clinical outcomes in CF patients. Short-term FEV1 might prove useful as a predictor of CF progression in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 18 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Unknown 17 81%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,622
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#325
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,620
of 359,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.