You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Representações sociais do cuidado em saúde de pessoas em situação de rua*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1980-220x2017023703314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Itana Carvalho Nunes Silva, Milena Vaz Sampaio Santos, Lorena Cardoso Mangabeira Campos, Dejeane de Oliveira Silva, Carlos Alberto Porcino, Jeane Freitas de Oliveira |
| Abstract |
Objective Identify and analyze the structure and content of the social representations of homeless people in relation to health care. Method Qualitative study, based on the structural approach of the Theory of Social Representations, conducted with homeless people, linked to two institutional shelters. To produce the data, the free-association test was used. The resulting data was processed by two software and analyzed according to the theory above. Results Seventy-two people participated in the study. The set of evocations from the four-quadrant chart refers to individual, social and cultural actions. The terms 'doctor', 'taking care of yourself' and 'eating' composed the central core of the representation, indicating image-related and functional dimensions of the object investigated. The word cloud confirmed the centrality of the terms. Conclusion The investigated group represents health care as a dynamic action, linked to the person and context, and is anchored in elements of the hygienist conception. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
| Psychology | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#267
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,559
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.