↓ Skip to main content

POPIA Code of Conduct for Research

Overview of attention for article published in South African Journal of Science, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
POPIA Code of Conduct for Research
Published in
South African Journal of Science, May 2021
DOI 10.17159/sajs.2021/10933
Authors

Rachel Adams, Fola Adeleke, Dominique Anderson, Ahmed Bawa, Nicola Branson, Alan Christoffels, Jantina de Vries, Harriet Etheredge, Eleni Flack-Davison, Mark Gaffley, Monique Marks, Mongezi Mdhluli, Safia Mahomed, Mapitso Molefe, Tshilidzi Muthivhi, Caroline Ncube, Antonel Olckers, Maria Papathanasopoulos, Jane Pillay, Tobias Schonwetter, Jerome Singh, Carmen Swanepoel, Michèle Ramsay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 19 15%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 7 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 65 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 71 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,928,886
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from South African Journal of Science
#136
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,710
of 455,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from South African Journal of Science
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.